The Government made a big step today - committing to action on the "unconscionable" claim that a woman consented to violence
An update:
We think today in parliament brought promise of very good news. At the Public Bill Committee in parliament, Jess Phillips made an incredible speech to move the amendments to the Domestic Abuse bill to end rough sex defences, proposed by Harriet Harman, Mark Garnier, Laura Farris and supported by more than 80 MPs from 6 parties.
Alex Chalk responded for the Government - and promised the Government will come back with its own proposals by Report stage of this bill. This is what we had hoped: that the amendments would keep pressure on the Government to make its own proposals, and today we heard more on the intent, if not yet the detail, of those proposals.
In particular, Alex Chalk said:
That Harriet Harman and Mark Garnier had run a formidable campaign and have engaged very closely and constructively with the Government.
It was “unconscionable for a defendant to say that the death of a woman, and it is almost invariably a woman, is justified, excusable, or legally defensible, because that woman had engaged in violent and harmful sexual activity, which resulted in her death, simply because she consented. That is unconscionable, and this Government is committed to making that crystal clear.”
The Government will make sure that their proposals go further than the scope of the Domestic Abuse bill, ensuring that (for instance) women who’d only just met the men will be protected, leaving no “wiggle room” for defendants.
Speaking of his time as a defence and prosecution barrister: “your job as a defence advocate is to exploit whatever wiggle room there is in the law – our job here is to close that down.”
And that the Government’s own proposals will “give practitioners – but more importantly people - the absolute clarity on what is and what is not acceptable.”
And gave assurance that the Government’s aim is to set out their approach to “rough sex” in time for the bill’s report stage.
Jess Phillips MP agreed on this basis to withdraw the “rough sex” amendment for “no consent to death” saying as she did so: “I am very pleased to hear that we will have intention at Report, and I speak entirely for the hon member for Wyre Forest and for Camberwell & Peckham in that regard.”
More on this when we see what the Government do next, but this is a huge step forward.
Jess Phillips and others talk of the need for the rough sex amendments, from 10:34:30 https://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/2f50e204-61f7-4c92-8404-2a2c47924a78
Alex Chalk speaks on this from 10:58:30 https://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/2f50e204-61f7-4c92-8404-2a2c47924a78
Quote from Fiona Mackenzie, WCCTT founder: “We agree with Alex Chalk that Harriet Harman and Mark Garnier’s campaign has been formidable, and have long said that only the government can make the far reaching change that is needed: with law change and more to end the success of rough sex defences. Today gave us real belief that the Government may be ready to do this – but they must be bold enough and not take half measures.
Our petition with Grazia magazine is at 66,000 signatures.
We Can’t Consent To This’s evidence to the Domestic Abuse bill committee in support of the amendments, and noting the areas where the government would need to go further in their own proposals:
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5801/cmpublic/DomesticAbuse/memo/DAB20.htm